WarpZone's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[ComicBookMovie]

An inferior knock-off of Death VS Monsters. Its biggest crimes are probably lousy sound design.

Aesthetics are a mess even though the individual art styles are all well-executed, because they made the thematic mistake of pairing C-64-era retro music with modern flash graphics. You can't hear it when you take a hit, can't hear enemies explode, can't hear anything at all really aside from the music and the most pitiful coin ding as3sfxr ever crapped out.

The story seems to be... uh... you're a bad person if you liked Avengers, I guess? That's all I could get out of the title screen. The lame theme spreads to the enemies, the power-ups, and the backgrounds, turning what could have been a fun romp into an abstract clash between two sides you don't care about.

Gameplay-wise, it's an okay Bullet Hell shooter with RPG grind. Mouse to move feels floating and imprecise, but the shots travel slow enough that I didn't usually feel unduly threatened. It was nice of them to point out the hitbox at the start of the game, though I would have prefered more precise keyboard controls. Also, if your Flash game uses the mouse, you ALWAYS store the previous frame's mouse position, check to see if the new mouse position is 0,0, and if it is, use the old mouse position. This prevents a common Flash bug where the player scrolls up and left if the mouse ever goes outside the fucking screen.

Progress feels slow and limited even though technically it probably isn't. I chalk this up to failure to telegraph progress. Overall the psychology of this game is very scattered and uninspired. It's almost as if somebody who doesn't speak English googled what was trending in America 6-12 months ago when this was in development and then built the game around that. I don't understand why they decided to take the piss out of the Avengers, though. It feels like a super-cynical move to include it in the first place, so why pick the side that you know 99% of gamers are going to be AGAINST? Unless they were talking about a typical (bad) superhero movie. But they don't specify that in the intro. They make it sound like a really great superhero movie. So I'm lost. Where did this creative decision come from.

Also, I have no idea what the phrase "Tin Foil Woman" actually means. Google Translate! For when native English sexism just isn't sexist enough! (tm)

[Hut Defense]

Hut Defense is a misleading name. Instead of defensive structures, the huts you build serve no purpose other than to spawn units and occasionally issue them orders. The game is actually a single-lane army swarm game. I didn't have the patience to grind much further past the Battle Axe unit (which is a shame because the crossbows are where moving back and forth starts to get interesting,) The problem is you can't replay levels you've already gotten three stars on, you need 5000 gold for the next unit (which the enemy army already HAS,) and if this pattern continues, dragons will be raping my army while I'm still struggling to unlock land units. And that's just gold. Forget about levelling up your units. Axeman is nearly obsolete and I'm only at 135/500? Yeah, no thanks.

Lack of levels and units are not the problem. The problem is that the developers want me to do an unreasonable amount of grinding just to unlock the units the game already has. In fact, it's not even grinding, near as I can tell. I just need to lose battles over and over again until I have enough coins to progress. No fucking thanks.

Why are "gold" and "coins" two separate resource types? I accidentally wasted coins on gold increase skills I never actually wanted. I wish there were a way to respec Skills. Oh, and don't be fooled. That treasure chest that gives you bonus coins in the early stages? Yeah, that goes away in the later stages. It feels as punishing as a pay-to-win game, except without any actual gold shop to make the pain stop. Just plain misguided, confusing, and bad all around.

I did like the monster designs, though..

[Cycle; Third Dream]

This is the most amazing Purgatory simulator I have ever played. I tried everything I could think of to make something interesting happen. I used my axe on the floorboards of my house, on my neighbor's house, on the Mayor. I bought a safe and tried to stuff it full of cash. I tried to buy a pink shirt with a star on it just because it was half off, then the damn game thought I was more overlapping the carpet next to the shirt, apparently, then the damn store kicked me out because night fell while I was fighting the menu. In a fit of desperation, I actually tried talking to the NPCs, even though I knew perfectly well that they're all vapid idiots with nothing to say. That's when I discovered that the fisherman will duplicate a function of the shopkeep, but only on Saundays? Uh. Thanks, I guess. I tried for 2 minutes to buy bait before I figured out that I was clicking on his name.

But the last straw had to be when I walked out of my house, saw row after row of fruit-laden trees. Waiting for me. Ten seconds of waiting each. I felt my soul die inside. I can't do this any more. It's just. So. BORING.

So basically it's like my Grepolis experience, but with an even shorter honeymoon period.

I only have one thing to say to 08jackt: Please stop wasting my time. Give me a reason to be here, a reason to care about these characters and this world, a non-cosmetic reason to care how much money I'm making. It can be anything at all. But for fuck's sake, put something noteworthy or precious or terrible or scary or amazing or awesome or fun IN THERE!

One star because mysterious footsteps in my house when I wake up scared the pants off of me and made me think the whole thing was about to go off the rails... until I realized it was just part of the background music and you'd probably have stripped it out of there if the sound design had actually been up to you, but you're just using whatever free sounds you could get ahold of, aren't you?

Bottom line: Minecraft minus everything you love about Minecraft. Glitch minus everything that made Glitch great. Hell, I've played FARMVILLE clones this week on Newgrounds that felt like they were giving me more gameplay for my time. Cow Clickers, Cookie Clickers, every kind of tedious time-waster mobile-like inexplicably focus-tested on the one website guaranteed to give them the worst possible reception, and a FEW of them managed to make me feel like I was being entertained for a few seconds at a time. Not this one. I would make a joke about it being a viscous cycle, but there's nothing viscous about it. It's a piece of cardboard in a tumble-drier on low heat.

The one nice thing I can say about it is it didn't slow down on my computer, despite using movieclips. But that's probably because nothing ever happens. Ever. Imagine my shock when I turned the quality down to Low and discovered it was this slow ON PURPOSE!

JackAstral responds:

Ahaha fair calls. Really the game is intended to be slow and peaceful- obviously it isn't for everyone xD

Thanks for the suggestions and criticisms though, I'll take note of them for future versions. It means a lot that you took the time to play and review it, despite not enjoying the game. Thanks for your time, hopefully I'll be able to work on some projects that are a little more exciting (and fun :b) to you in the future.

[Guard Of The Kingdom]

A Tower Defense game pretty much built from the ground up for casual audiences on mobile devices, Guard Of The Kingdom appears quite deep at first, a trick it achieves by telling you *nothing* about the units other than their prices, but once you've tested every unit out, the game ends up being literally one-dimensional.

Every enemy will walk past every tower you build. Some enemies are slow and others are fast, but none are immune to any particular type of tower. This means that Acid Acid Acid Ice is pretty much the only combination worth building, although I've achieved interesting results in Survival by building Acid Stone Acid Stone all along the bottom row to cluster enemies together.

Honestly, I can't hold this against the game TOO much, since this was kind of an "Aha!" moment for me. Sometimes Tower Defense games can get *too* well-balanced, to the point where the only reason to build one combination of towers over another boils down to semi-random idiosyncrasies of the pathing, movement speeds, and AI. If we assume the creators of the game are non-native english speakers, I'd rather play a simple game with an obvious right answer than a complex game with poor explanations of how units work.

What's really strange is, about halfway through the game, they start pitching puzzle levels at you where you only get to choose between three specific units. Unfortunately, there's only two of these, and one of them has acid included as one of the options, so you really don't get very far from your comfort zone. The entire game could have been like this. Instead, they give you all the units, do a couple of these restricted levels, then give you all the units back again. Maybe in playtesting, people weren't figuring out that you need to go acid in order to beat the later stages? I dunno. I felt like more could have been done with this mechanic, since it was the only time I was forced to actually think after solving a game which, with only one lane one damage type, and one best unit, seems predisposed to be very much solvable.

Overall, it's a tactically dull TD with slick polish and some incredibly solid coding. At first I couldn't believe it was powered by Flash, until I remembered that they probably developed it using CS5, targeting Mobile. The graphics have that look to them when you zoom in, like they were rasterized long ago, before the game was even compiled. These sprites have NEVER seen a MovieClip. And while that's generally a good thing in Flash, it betrays this game's DNA. It was built for casual gamers, and it shows. If you take that into account, it's not too bad.

xewelus responds:

Thanks for respond, but threre is a mistake/ This game always prerenders an art on start using screen resolution. Only Flash MovieClips.

[Cosmic Clicks]

Now THIS is how you make a cookie clicker clone on Newgrounds! Back in my Planet Clicker review, we saw how NOT to do it. Fortunately, Cosmic Clicks delivers the goods. Why would anyone make a free game that rips off another free game? I say why the hell not! The gameplay is every bit as good as Cookie Clicker, and the characters and humor are fresh. I personally worked the tech tree from back to front and didn't particularly regret what that did to the story. X3

Everyone even remotely interested in game design should play Cookie Clicker, Planet Clicker, and Cosmic Clicks, in that order, for a textbook example of the DOs and DON'Ts of firing off a Me-Too entry into a popular new genre. New Theme = Good. New IP = good. Missing Features = Bad. Shit Programming = Very bad. Increased wait time in a game based on waiting = deal-breaker. Cosmic Clicks succeeded in every way that Planet Clicker failed.

Best of luck to DarqTimmy. Now I need to go check out Boss 101, see what these guys were up to back in the day...

DarkTimmy responds:

Thanks so much and really glad you like the game. I will be frank and say I didn't know how this would be received. I mean, I liked it and enjoyed making it. haha. It was very nice to see others enjoyed it too! I heard about some clicker games but in many ways I just made Cosmic Clicks and didn't check too hard on what else was out there. I do admit to loving the click games though!

Thanks again for the nice review and the comments, Really made my day to read it along with all the other nice reviews. More to come for sure so look for info on Boss 101 sequels as well as a possible Cosmic Clicks sequel!

Best, -Tim

[Space Flash Arena]

I'm amazed that this only has a 3-star average. Sure, 40 kills is way too long to spend flying around the same map fighting the same two enemies over and over again, but the controls and presentation are both rock-solid! Is there a better 3D dogfighting game in Flash out there that I don't know about?

My one complaint is that when you get the reticule on an enemy ship's lead indicator, it turns white, making it HARDER to maintain the lock, not easier. :( Five stars for sheer ambition and solid follow-through.

[Joe X]

On the surface, this is just another flash game, high on style and attitude, low on mechanics and replayability. But once you've been playing it for a bit, you start to realize just how hard the developer is trying to force Flash to be something that it isn't... to deliver an aesthetic experience that the platform just can't manage. At least not on my system, and not with this level of optimization.

The controls are responsive, but you're almost never in a position to fire your gun. There's always something too close, especially when you're first dropping into a mosh pit fulla enemies. You can't press down and jump at the same time to drop down to another level, so it makes you wonder why they didn't just make Up an alternate jump. No in-game explanation of the controls. Yeah, I see it up there now, but when I was playing the game and forming my first impressions, I had no idea all those other buttons existed. I found the arrow keys and A and S and assumed that was the whole game.

The camera absolutely hates you. It's slow to react to your movements, and there's always blurry crap in the foreground. When are retro side-scrollers going to stop doing this? We had the technology in 8-bit Nintendo to layer crap in front of the playing field, guys. There's a reason we didn't use it. Tiny things in the foreground giving an illusion of depth = more immersion. Giant things in the way that make you think "god dammit why do the game developers hate me so much" = LESS immersion. All you had to do was not make your stupid "I wish I was directing a movie instead of making a video game" cinematic bullshit not fuck up the gameplay. Shakey-cam might have been okay if it had a purpose, but here it just felt abstract and floaty, with no real purpose other than to remind you that the developers figured out how to implement shakey-cam. It's not reserved for footsteps and earthquakes, and it's not used intelligently to simulate the feel of a handheld camera, it just shakes the fuck out of the camera at all times. Maybe there was a race condition happening between Flash's update speed and the code that accounts for camera movement, I don't know. It probably didn't help when the frame rate started to drop.

Which brings me to performance. Generally the bane of all Flash games, but particularly nasty when a developer tests their game on a next-gen rig without giving any thought whatsoever to optimization. In this age of Adobe trying to sabotage Flash's own legacy with increasingly buggy Flash Player releases, of developers abandoning the web as we know it in favor of mobile platforms that just don't want to run non-native code, and newbies pouring into both the developer space and userbase, you absolutely NEED to test your flash game on a shitty rig. I did not play this game long enough for it to really chug, but I could tell the unfinished garbage collection was starting to pile up. It didn't feel like a MovieClip game. There was too much stuff going on at once. Scrolling. Hordes of enemies. Frame rates would have started off in the crapper if they were relying on MovieClips for everything. But whatever they were doing for optimization purposes, they weren't doing enough of it. Maybe they needed to cache those blurred objects instead of applying a blur filter every frame. Maybe they just needed to lower the update rate in the Flash IDE so it has time to breathe and run Garbage Collection. Maybe they should have used dirty variables and Object Pooling to avoid creating and destroying objects at runtime. I couldn't speculate. But whatever they were doing for optimization, they needed to do better. This is not sufficient to allow the game to run at reasonable frame rates on my computers, and I've seen better Flash games get away with more in the past. I do appreciate the obvious use of delta-timing and the responsiveness of inputs.

So. More levels? More variety? Bosses? Upgrades? Collectibles? Sure, any or all of that stuff, if well-implemented, would have been nice to have. But I didn't even get to the point where I had time to realize how shallow the game was like other reviewers have said. I was too busy being put off by obnoxious foreground objects and enemy swarms that give me no real opportunity to slip in there and lay down some lead. Full points for style and a good-faith attempt at optimization. But I wouldn't go so far as to call it playable.

Lower the attempted frame rate to something like 20 and get rid of the foreground objects, show me all the controls when the game starts, or better still put in a MegamanX style first level where you need to use the moves to get through, and I could see playing this for another 5 or 10 minutes. If it's really just the one level as some reviews have said, I probably wouldn't have given it a much higher score, but I would have at least felt like the game wasn't talking over my head (system requirements) while saying nothing of interest (gameplay).

[Zos]

I'm sorry, but this game just put me to sleep. I must not be the right audience for it, because I could tell everything about the game was incredibly well-done, and it all contributes to a cohesive whole. But that whole is so painfully DULL.

You play as Browny McTangrey, a dull protagonist on the planet Brownplace IV. One day he literally walks down the block and gets told by an old man to save the universe. You see, there once was an ancient lovecraftian horror, then some people destroyed its brain by shooting it with magical space laser swords or something, then it ate the entire universe, and now it's back and you have to kill it. Don't ask me why they didn't just kill it themselves when they, you know, destroyed its brain and all. It's a good thing sentient life couldn't possibly have evolved on any of those other planets in the Universe. No, no. Just these seven. Whoopsie!

The controls are functional, clean and precise, but good lord the dynamics are awkward. I had flashbacks to 8-bit Castlevania, but not in the good way, since we're looking at like 3 animals per planet, at least in the part I played. Your primary attack is to throw flasks of fire potion that you created an infinite supply of by combining three small plants and no glass.

In dialogue, where everyone looks the same and you never choose what to say, you have two options for text display speed. You can either read the text slow by tapping the button once, or hold down the button so it goes as fast as it can with no pauses, but since it's limited to one character per EnterFrame, it's still almost exactly as slow. Heaven forbid it should just show you the whole paragraph at once or something. Clearly a little "blippity beep" sound effect while the letters appear that was already stale in 1986 and doesn't have any real reason for existing when the text isn't in kana is clearly worth wasting my time.

Then you travel to a jungle planet full of tribal sterotypes and you keep dying and needing to climb this mountian and OH GOD the music somebody give me some forks so I can stab myself in the legs just to get sensation flowing again. I could honestly put up with all of it, the bull backgrounds, the dull premise, the flat characters that are barely one-dimmensional archetypes, the slow text, the slow walking, the slow, slow, slow combat against slow enemies using slow, awkward weapons that involve hitting a parabolic arc with another parabolic arc... I could power through all of that shit and give the story one last chance to wow me on planets 3 and 4, if the music weren't SO FUCKING DULL.

The music in this game just puts you to sleep. It's this painful, tedious funeral dirge that just sucks all the life out of your body and leaves you a listless corpse, one cold, dead hand on the keyboard, tapping out an epitaph composed of left, right, up and space. When I finally died on top of the mountain and had to re-collect all the ingredients in the village, I wasn't even mad. I couldn't be. Anger is an emotion, and the music had rendered me dead inside. I just went "oh," and quietly closed the window to write this review. When you first get to the jungle planet, it actually sounds upbeat, until you get used to it. 20 or 30 iterations later, you're dead inside again. It's just... BLUH..... BLUH BLUH BLUH..... BLUH BLUH BLUH..... for 3 hours. I want to slap my own face just to wake up!

After a review that negative, you might wonder why the rating is so high. Well, it's because a lot of effort went into this, and it shows. They were clearly going for a certain vibe here, and to an extent they succeeded. I respect this game as art. But Jesus Christ don't ever PLAY it.

It is a dead, cold, lifeless husk of a game. Do not be fooled by the retro graphics and Castlevania-inspired combat mechanics. This is not an exciting action-RPG sidescroller. More like it got all the recessive genes of Castlevania II... the story, the dialogue, the imprecise control mixed with a health bar that removes all sense of challenge... and then swiped the rest of its DNA from Flashback. Or more like that new "spiritual successor" to Flashback whose name escaped me at the moment. No, not Gunpoint. Gunpoint was awesome. The one that didn't work.

It's like. Move. Wait. Move. Wait. Inane Dialogue. Wait Wait Wait Novel Jumping Puzzle You Died. Wait.

And the worst part is they are TRYING SO FUCKING HARD to make this WORK! It just doesn't. I can't. Take my four stars. Just take them. Use them to build a better life! I just. The game sucks I can't handle it! Just take the stars!

Asvegren responds:

ahahahahaha jesus

[Planet clicker]

Okay so we've all played Cookie Clicker. We know what makes it fun, right? Watching the numbers go up. Watching our elaborate collection of eldritch cookie generators pile up. Selling our Grandma. Planet Clicker enjoys none of those benefits. So what does it offer instead? Not a whole hell of a lot.

Where Cookie Clicker was silly, Planet Clicker takes itself seriously. Where took a simple premise and cracked it up to 11, Planet Clicker takes an elaborate premise (seeding planetary life) and dials the interest back down to near zero. (Seriously, this makes Spore look epic.) Where Cookie Clicker does what it can to be fast and responsive, despite the limitations of being implemented in JavaScript, Planet Clicker is so bad at leveraging the pros and cons of Flash that A ONE SECOND UPDATE LITERALLY TAKES FIVE SECONDS.

For a shameless knock-off, this game sure loves to reinvent the wheel. Remember how in Cookie Clicker, most of the actual play game from trying to guess which was faster? Taking a series of small boosts now, or saving up for a big one later? Well that's all gone here. Instead, you NEED to buy so many of the less desirable upgrades before you're ALLOWED to buy a better one like Human or City. Sure, it makes thematic sense, but it absolutely destroys the gamplay in the process. Seriously, agonizing over the decision of when to go for the next tier literally WAS THE GAME in Cookie Clicker.

And while technically, you can see your upgrades, and they look fine, they're not as spectacular as they were in Cookie Clicker. You never see explosions of life or particle effects or amusing news headlines about how your planet is doing. I guess you can see your cows from space. So there's that. But it's too little, too late. It's nothing compared to the showers of cookies and armies of Grandmas you've already seen in Cookie Clicker. I could personally make this game in Flash and have entire herds of cows swarming around on the surface, and even if that was too hard, I damned sure would have implemented a delta-timer rather than just trusting EnterFrame to run at a fixed speed.

Bottom line, Planet Clicker does almost nothing its spiritual ancestor did right. It's excruciatingly slow, mind-numbingly tedious, completely devoid of humor, and ultimately it's the one thing a god-game about seeding life on a planet has absolutely no excuse for being:

Lifeless.

[Tesla: War Of Currents]

I'm frustrated because I really wanted to like this game. It's great fun until you start trying to use your brain, then you realize that the game's mechanics are stacked against you.

Try this: Build two medics and three long-range units, and march your team around a loop with another row of towers parallel to them. You'd think the medics would heal each other, and the long range attackers would take out the row of towers that can't shoot back because you're not in range, right?

And actually, that's exactly what happens for a little bit! But then your medics just straight-up STOP WORKING, and the long-range units stop attacking, even though they killed two other enemy guns the same distance away.

There is a hard limit on how useful your choices can be. This limit is not encoded into the game's explicitly explained mechanics. Rather, the limit is hidden in the background, encoded into mechanics the developer understands but the player is not allowed to see.

You are not allowed to understand how the game works. You are not allowed to outsmart the game. You are only allowed to build the same boring, ineffective unit combinations as everybody else and use your special powers to make up the difference in healing and damage output.

END RESULT: the entire game is bullshit. Thinking will not help you win. The harder you think about how to do better, the stupider you feel when it doesn't work. This is "modern" game design at its most insipid and annoying. Everything is limited by cooldown rates and hard limits on how effective any one choice can be. They might as well have just put a mobile phone game's "energy system" in there while they were at it. And what was the benefit? I could see this kinda bullshit being the result of greed if the developer was somehow getting paid for making the game less fun, but here the anti-fun serves no purpose.

Why do you care if I build something clever, NSBrotherhood? Why do you want me to do the same mediocre job at beating your game as every other player? Why are you so invested in preventing me from spanking your game with a really well-designed team that exploits the hell out of core principles? Why are you hiding rules from me? Why are you using anti-fun game design techniques we usually only see on mobile games? How does this benefit you, the developer?

This is not a strategy game. It's a cow-clicker with a very elaborate interface.